Iq option b
Griffith agreed to pay Thomas Dixon 10,000 equivalent to 255,249 in 2019 for the rights to his play The Clansman. Since he ran out of money and could afford only 2,500 of the original option, Griffith offered Dixon 25 percent interest in the picture. Dixon reluctantly agreed, and the unprecedented success of the film made him rich. Dixon s proceeds were the largest sum any author had received up to 2007 for a motion picture story and amounted to several million dollars.
33 The American historian John Hope Franklin suggested that many aspects of the script for The Birth of a Nation appeared to reflect Dixon s concerns more than Griffith s, as Dixon had an obsession in his novels of describing in loving detail the lynchings of Black men, which did not reflect Griffith s interests. Filming Edit. Griffith began filming on July 4, 1914 34 and was finished by October 1914.
28 421 Some filming took place in Big Bear Lake, California. Griffith took over the Hollywood studio of Kinemacolor. West Point engineers provided technical advice on the American Civil War battle scenes, providing Griffith with the artillery used in the film. Much of the filming was done on the Griffith Ranch in San Fernando Valley, with the Petersburg scenes being shot at what is today Forest Lawn Memorial Park and other scenes being shot in Whittier and Ojai Valley.
Many of the African Americans in the film were portrayed by white actors in blackface. 36 37 The film s war scenes were influenced after Robert Underwood Johnson s book Battles and Leaders of the Civil WarHarper s Pictorial History of the Civil WarThe Soldier in Our Civil Warand Mathew Brady s photography. Griffith initially claimed this was deliberate, stating on careful weighing of every detail concerned, the decision was to have no black blood among the principals; it was only in the legislative scene that Negroes were used, and then only as extra people.
However Black extras who had been housed in segregated quarters, including Griffith s acquaintance and frequent collaborator Madame Sul-Te-Wan, can be seen in many other shots of the film. Griffith s budget started at US 40,000 33 equivalent to 1,010,000 in 2019 but rose to over 100,000 3 equivalent to 2,530,000 in 2019. By the time he finished filming, Griffith shot approximately 150,000 feet of footage or about 36 hours worth of filmwhich he edited down to 13,000 feet just over 3 hours.
34 The film was edited after early screenings in reaction to audience reception, and existing prints of the film are missing footage from the standard version of the film. Evidence exists that the film originally included scenes of white slave traders seizing Blacks from West Africa and detaining them aboard a slave ship, Southern congressmen in the House of Representatives, Northerners reacting to the results of the 1860 presidential election, the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, a Union League meeting, depictions of martial law in South Carolina, and a battle sequence.
In addition, several scenes were cut at the insistence of New York Mayor John Purroy Mitchel due to their highly racist content before its release in New York City, including a female abolitionist activist recoiling from the body odor of a Black boy, Black men seizing white women on the streets of Piedmont, and deportations of Blacks with the title Lincoln s Solution.
It was also long rumored, including by Griffith s biographer Seymour Stern, that the original film included a rape scene between Gus and Flora before her suicide, but in 1974 the cinematographer Karl Brown denied that such a scene had been filmed. Although The Birth of iq option b Nation is commonly regarded as a landmark for its dramatic and visual innovations, its use of music was arguably no less revolutionary.
38 Though film was still silent at the time, it was common practice to distribute musical cue sheets, or less commonly, full scores usually for organ or piano accompaniment along with each print of a film. For The Birth of a Nationcomposer Joseph Carl Breil created a three-hour-long musical score that combined all three types of music in use at the time adaptations of existing works by classical composers, new arrangements of well-known melodies, and original composed music.
38 Though it had been specifically composed for the film, Breil s score was not used for the Los Angeles première of the film at Clune s Auditorium; rather, a score compiled by Carli Elinor was performed in its stead, and this score was used exclusively in West Coast showings. Breil s score was not used until the film debuted in New York at the Liberty Theatre but it was the score featured in all showings save those on the West Coast.
Outside of original compositions, Breil adapted classical music for use in the film, including passages from Der Freischütz by Carl Maria von Weber, Leichte Kavallerie by Franz von Suppé, Symphony No. 6 by Ludwig van Beethoven, and Ride of the Valkyries by Richard Wagner, the latter used as a leitmotif during the ride of the KKK. 38 Breil also arranged several traditional and popular tunes that would have been recognizable to audiences at the time, including many Southern melodies; among these songs were Maryland, My MarylandDixie42 Old Folks at HomeThe Star-Spangled BannerAmerica the BeautifulThe Battle Hymn of the RepublicAuld Lang Syneand Where Did You Get That Hat.
He has also cited Breil s use of music by Richard Wagner as influential on subsequent Hollywood films, including Star Wars 1977 and Apocalypse Now 1979. In his original compositions for the film, Breil wrote numerous leitmotifs to accompany the appearance of specific characters. The principal love theme that was created for the romance between Elsie Stoneman and Ben Cameron was published as The Perfect Song and is regarded as the first marketed theme song from a film; it was later used as the theme song for the popular radio and television sitcom Amos n Andy.
Theatrical run Edit. The first public showing of the film, then called The Clansmanwas on January 1 and 2, 1915, at the Loring Opera House in Riverside, California. 45 The second night, it was sold out and people were turned away. 38 43 DJ Spooky has called Breil s score, with its mix of Dixieland songs, classical music and vernacular heartland music an early, pivotal accomplishment in remix culture. 46 It was shown on February 8, 1915, to an audience of 3,000 persons at Clune s Auditorium in downtown Los Angeles.
The film s backers understood that the film needed a massive publicity campaign if they were to cover the immense cost of producing it. A major part of this campaign was the release of the film in a roadshow theatrical release. This allowed Griffith to charge premium prices for tickets, sell souvenirs, and build excitement around the film before giving it a wide release.
For several months, Griffith s team traveled to various cities to show the film for one or two nights before moving on. This strategy was immensely successful. Change of title Edit. The title was changed to The Birth of a Nation before the March 2 New York opening. 27 329 However, Dixon copyrighted the title The Birth of a Nation in 1905, 27 329 and it was used in the press as early as January 2, 1915, 48 49 while it was still referred to as The Clansman in October.
Special screenings Edit. White House showing Edit. Birth of a Nation was the first movie shown in the White House, in the East Room, on February 18, 1915. 51 An earlier movie, the Italian Cabiria 1914was shown on the lawn. It was attended by President Woodrow Wilson, members of his family, and members of his Cabinet. 52 Both Dixon and Griffith were present. 53 126 As put by Dixon, not an impartial source, it repeated the triumph of the first showing.
There is dispute about Wilson s attitude toward the movie. A newspaper reported that he received many letters protesting against his alleged action in Indorsing the pictures sicincluding a letter from Massachusetts Congressman Thomas Chandler Thacher. 52 The showing of the movie had caused several near-riots. 52 When Assistant Attorney General William H. Walters, a bishop of the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church, called at the White House to add their protestsPresident Wilson s private secretary, Joseph Tumulty, showed them a letter he had written to Thacher on Wilson s behalf.
According to the letter, Wilson had been entirely unaware of the character of the play movie before it was presented and has at no time expressed his approbation of it. Its exhibition at the White House was a courtesy extended to an old acquaintance. 52 Dixon, in his autobiography, quotes Wilson as saying, when Dixon proposed showing the movie at the White House, that I am pleased to be able to do this little thing for you, because a long time ago you took a day out of your busy life to do something for me.
29 298 What Dixon had done for Wilson was to suggest him for an honorary degree, which Wilson received, from Dixon s alma materWake Forest College. Dixon had been a fellow graduate student in history with Wilson at Johns Hopkins University and, in 1913, dedicated his historical novel about Lincoln, The Southernerto our first Southern-born president since Lincoln, my friend and collegemate Woodrow Wilson. The evidence that Wilson knew the character of the play in advance of seeing it is circumstantial but very strong Given Dixon s career and the notoriety attached to the play The Clansmanit is not unreasonable to assume that Wilson must have had some idea of at least the general tenor of the film.
54 513 The movie was based on a best-selling novel and was preceded by a stage version play which was received with protests in several cities in some cities it was prohibited and received a great deal of news coverage. Wilson issued no protest when the Evening Starat that time Washington s newspaper of recordreported in advance of the showing, in language suggesting a press release from Dixon and Griffiths, that Dixon was a schoolmate of President Wilson and is an intimate friendand that Wilson s interest in it is due to the great lesson of peace it teaches.
51 Wilson, and only Wilson, is quoted by name in the movie for his observations on American history, and the title of Wilson s book History of the American People is mentioned as well. 54 518 519 The three title cards with quotations from Wilson s book read. Adventurers swarmed out of the North, as much the enemies of one race as of the other, to cozen, beguile and use the negroes. Ellipsis in the original. In the villages the negroes were the office holders, men who knew none of the uses of authority, except its insolences.
The policy of the congressional leaders wrought a veritable overthrow of civilization in the South. in their determination to put the white South under the heel of the black South. Ellipses and underscore in the original. The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self-preservation. until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the southern country.
In the same book, Wilson has harsh words about the abyss between the original goals of the Klan and what it evolved into. 55 56 Dixon has been accused of misquoting Wilson. In 1937 a popular magazine reported that Wilson said of the film, It is like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is all so terribly true. 57 Wilson over the years had several times used the metaphor of illuminating history as if by lightning and he may well have said it at the time.
The accuracy of his saying it was terribly true is disputed by historians; there is no contemporary documentation of the remark. 54 521 58 Vachel Lindsay, a popular poet of the time, is known to have referred to the film as art by lightning flash. Showing in the Raleigh Hotel ballroom Edit. The next day, February 19, 1915, Griffith and Dixon held a showing of the film in the Raleigh Hotel ballroom, which they had hired for the occasion. Early that morning, Dixon called on a North Carolina friend, the white-supremacist Josephus Daniels, Secretary of the Navy.
Daniels set up a meeting that morning for Dixon with Edward Douglass White, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Initially Justice White was not interested in seeing the film, but when Dixon told him it was the true story of Reconstruction and the Klan s role in saving the SouthWhite, recalling his youth in Louisiana, jumped to attention and said I was a member of the Klan, sir. 60 171 172 With White agreeing to see the film, the rest of the Supreme Court followed.
In addition to the entire Supreme Court, in the audience were many members of Congress and members of the diplomatic corps61 62 the Secretary of the Navy, 38 members of the Senate, and about 50 members of the House of Representatives. Consequences Edit. The audience of 600 cheered and applauded throughout. In Griffith s words, the showings to the president and the entire Supreme Court iq option b an honor upon Birth of a Nation. 54 page needed Dixon and Griffith used this commercially.
The following day, Griffith and Dixon transported the film to New York City for review by the National Board of Censorship. They presented the film as endorsed by the President and the cream of Washington society. The Board approved the film by 15 to 8. A warrant to close the theater in which the movie was to open was dismissed after a long-distance call to the White House confirmed that the film had been shown there.
29 303 60 173. Justice White was very angry when advertising for the film stated that he approved it, and he threatened to denounce it publicly. Dixon clearly was rattled and upset by criticism by African Americans that the movie encouraged hatred against them, and he wanted the endorsement of as many powerful men as possible to offset such criticism. 28 page needed Dixon always vehemently denied having anti-Black prejudices despite the way his books promoted white supremacy and stated My books are hard reading for a Negro, and yet the Negroes, in denouncing them, are unwittingly denouncing one of their greatest friends.
In a letter sent on May 1, 1915, to Joseph P. Tumulty, Wilson s secretary, Dixon wrote The real purpose of my film was to revolutionize Northern sentiments by a presentation of history that would transform every man in the audience into a good Democrat. 28 430 In a letter to President Wilson sent on September 5, 1915, Dixon boasted This play is transforming the entire population of the North and the West into sympathetic Southern voters.
Every man who comes out of the theater is a Southern partisan for life. There will never be an issue of your segregation policy. 28 430 Dixon was alluding to the fact that Wilson, upon becoming president in 1913, had allowed cabinet members to impose segregation on federal workplaces in Washington, D. by reducing the number of Black employees through demotion or dismissal. New opening titles on re-release Edit. One famous part of the film was added by Griffith only on the second run of the film 67 and is missing from most online versions of the film presumably taken from first run prints.
These are the second and third of three opening title cards which defend the film. A PLEA FOR THE ART OF THE MOTION PICTURE. The added titles read. We do not fear censorship, for we have no wish to offend with improprieties or obscenities, but we do demand, as a right, the liberty to show the dark side of wrong, that we may illuminate the bright side of virtue the same liberty that is conceded to the art of the written word that art to which we owe the Bible and the works of Shakespeare.
If in this work we have conveyed to the mind the ravages of war to the end that war may be held in abhorrence, this effort will not have been in vain. Various film historians have expressed a range of views about these titles. To Nicholas Andrew Miller, this shows that Griffith s greatest achievement in The Birth of a Nation was that he brought the cinema s capacity for spectacle. under the rein of an outdated, but comfortably literary form of historical narrative.
are not the pioneers of film spectacle. but the giants of literary narrative. 69 On the other hand, S. Kittrell Rushing complains about Griffith s didactic title-cards, 70 while Stanley Corkin complains that Griffith masks his idea of fact in the rhetoric of high art and free expression and creates film which erodes the very ideal of liberty which he asserts.
Griffith s models. Press reaction Edit. The New York Times gave it a quite brief review, calling it melodramatic and inflammatoryadding that A great deal might be said concerning the spirit revealed in Mr. Dixon s review of the unhappy chapter of Reconstruction and concerning the sorry service rendered by its plucking at old wounds.
Box office Edit. The box office gross of The Birth of a Nation is not known and has been the subject of exaggeration. 73 When the film opened, the tickets were sold at premium prices. The film played at the Liberty Theater at Times Square in New York City for 44 weeks with tickets priced at 2. 20 equivalent to 56 in 2019.
74 By the end of 1917, Epoch reported to its shareholders cumulative receipts of 4. 8 million, 75 and Griffith s own records put Epoch s worldwide earnings from the film at 5. 2 million as of 1919, 76 although the distributor s share of the revenue at this time was much lower than the exhibition gross. In the biggest cities, Epoch negotiated with individual theater owners for a percentage of the box office; elsewhere, the producer sold all rights in a particular state to a single distributor an arrangement known as state s rights distribution.
77 The film historian Richard Schickel says that under the state s rights contracts, Epoch typically received about 10 of the box office gross which theater owners often underreported and concludes that Birth certainly generated more than 60 million in box-office business in its first run. The film held the mantle of the highest-grossing film until it was overtaken by Gone with the Wind 1939another film about the Civil War and Reconstruction era.
78 79 By 1940 Time magazine estimated the film s cumulative gross rental the distributor s earnings at approximately 15 million. 80 For years Variety had the gross rental listed as 50 million, but in 1977 repudiated the claim and revised its estimate down to 5 million. 75 It is not known for sure how much the film has earned in total, but producer Harry Aitken put its estimated earnings at 15 18 million in a letter to a prospective investor in a proposed sound version. 76 It is likely the film earned over 20 million for its backers and generated 50 100 million in box office receipts.
4 In a 2015 Time article, Richard Corliss estimated the film had earned the equivalent of 1. 8 billion adjusted for inflation, a milestone that at the time had only been surpassed by Titanic 1997 and Avatar 2009 in nominal earnings. Criticism Edit. Like Dixon s novels and play, Birth of a Nation received considerable criticism, both before and after its premiere.
Dixon, who believed it entirely truthful, attributed this to Sectionalistsi. non-Southerners who in Dixon s opinion were hostile to the truth about the South. 29 301, 303 It was to counter these sinister forces and the dangerous. menace that Dixon and Griffiths sought the backing of President Wilson and the Supreme Court. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People NAACP protested at premieres of the film in numerous cities. According to the historian David Copeland, by the time of the movie s March 3 1915 premiere in New York City, its subject matter had embroiled the film in charges of racism, protests, and calls for censorship, which began after the Los Angeles branch of the NAACP requested the city s film board ban the movie.
Since film boards were composed almost entirely of whites, few review boards initially banned Griffith s picture. 82 The NAACP also conducted a public education campaign, publishing articles protesting the film s fabrications and inaccuracies, organizing petitions against it, and conducting education on the facts of the war and Reconstruction. 83 Because of the lack of success in NAACP s actions to ban the film, on April 17, 1915, NAACP secretary Mary Childs Nerney wrote to NAACP Executive Committee member George Packard I am utterly disgusted with the situation in regard to The Birth of a Nation.
kindly remember that we have put six weeks of constant effort of this thing and have gotten nowhere. Jane Addams, an American social worker and social reformer, and the founder of Hull House, voiced her reaction to the film in an interview published by the New York Post on March 13, 1915, just ten days after the film was released. 85 She stated that One of the most unfortunate things about this film is that it appeals to race prejudice upon the basis of conditions of half a century ago, which have nothing to do with the facts we have to consider to-day.
It is claimed that the play is historical but history is easy to misuse. 85 In New York, Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise told the press after seeing The Birth of a Nation that the film was an indescribable foul and loathsome libel on a race of human beings. 28 426 In Boston, Booker T. On Saturday, April 10, and again on April 17, Trotter and a group of other Blacks tried to buy tickets for the show s premiere at the Tremont Theater and were refused. They stormed the box office in protest, 260 police on standby rushed in, and a general melee ensued.
Trotter and ten others were arrested. Washington wrote a newspaper column asking readers to boycott the film, 28 426 while the civil rights activist William Monroe Trotter organized demonstrations against the film, which he predicted was going to worsen race relations. 86 The following day a huge demonstration was staged at Faneuil Hall. 14 87 In Washington D. C, the Reverend Francis James Grimké published a pamphlet entitled Fighting a Vicious Film that challenged the historical accuracy of The Birth of a Nation on a scene-by-scene basis.
When the film was released, riots also broke out in Philadelphia and other major cities in the United States. The film s inflammatory nature was a catalyst for gangs of whites to attack Blacks. On April 24, 1916, the Chicago American reported that a white man murdered a Black teenager in Lafayette, Indiana, after seeing the film, although there has been some controversy as to whether the murderer had actually seen The Birth of a Nation.
88 The mayor of Cedar Rapids, Iowa was the first of twelve mayors to ban the film in 1915 out of concern that it would promote race prejudice, after meeting with a delegation of Black citizens. 89 The NAACP set up a precedent-setting national boycott of the film, likely seen as the most successful effort. Additionally, they organized a mass demonstration when the film was screened in Boston, and it was banned in three states and several cities.
Both Griffith and Dixon in letters to the press dismissed African-American protests against The Birth of a Nation. 91 In a letter to The New York GlobeGriffith wrote that his film was an influence against the intermarriage of blacks and whites. 91 Dixon likewise called the NAACP the Negro Intermarriage Society and said it was against The Birth of a Nation for one reason only because it opposes the marriage of blacks to whites. 91 Griffith indignant at the film s negative critical reception wrote letters to newspapers and published a pamphlet in which he accused his critics of censoring unpopular opinions.
When Sherwin Lewis of The New York Globe wrote a piece that expressed criticism of the film s distorted portrayal of history and said that it was not worthy of constitutional protection because its purpose was to make a few dirty dollarsGriffith responded that the public should not be afraid to accept the truth, even though it might not like it. He also added that the man who wrote the editorial was damaging my reputation as a producer and a liar and a coward.
Audience reaction Edit. The Birth of a Nation was very popular, despite the film s controversy; it was unlike anything that American audiences had ever seen before. 94 The Los Angeles Times called it the greatest picture ever made and the greatest drama ever filmed. 95 Mary Pickford said Birth of a Nation was the first picture that really made people take the motion picture industry seriously. 96 It became a national cultural phenomenon merchandisers made Ku-Klux hats and kitchen aprons, and ushers dressed in white Klan robes for openings.
In New York there were Klan-themed balls and, in Chicago that Halloween, thousands of college students dressed in robes for a massive Klan-themed party. 97 The producers iq option b 15 detectives at the Liberty Theater in New York City to prevent disorder on the part of those who resent the reconstruction period episodes depicted. The Reverend Charles Henry Parkhurst argued that the film was not racist, saying that it was exactly true to history by depicting freedmen as they were and, therefore, it was a compliment to the black man by showing how far Black people had advanced since Reconstruction.
93 Critic Dolly Dalrymple wrote that, when I saw it, it was far from silent. incessant murmurs of approval, roars of laughter, gasps of anxiety, and outbursts of applause greeted every new picture on the screen. 99 One man viewing the film was so moved by the scene where Flora Cameron flees Gus to avoid being raped that he took out his handgun and began firing at the screen in an effort to help her.
99 Katharine DuPre Lumpkin recalled watching the film as an 18-year-old in 1915 in her 1947 autobiography The Making of a Southerner Here was the black figure and the fear of the white girl though the scene blanked out just in time. Here were the sinister men the South scorned and the noble men the South revered. Even then it does not tell the whole truth. And through it all the Klan rode. All around me people sighed and shivered, and now and then shouted or wept, in their intensity.
Griffith made a film in 1916, called Intolerancepartly in response to the criticism that The Birth of a Nation received. Sequel and spin-offs Edit. Griffith made clear within numerous interviews that the film s title and main themes were chosen in response to those who he felt had been intolerant to The Birth of a Nation. 101 A sequel called The Fall of a Nation was released in 1916, depicting the invasion of the United States by a German-led confederation of European monarchies and criticizing pacifism in the context of the First World War.
It was the first sequel in film history. 102 The film was directed by Thomas Dixon Jr.who adapted it from his novel of the same name. Despite its success in the foreign market, the film was not a success among American audiences, 11 102 and is now a lost film. In 1918, an American silent drama film directed by John W. Noble called The Birth of a Race was released as a direct response to The Birth of a Nation. 104 The film was an ambitious project by producer Emmett Jay Scott to challenge Griffith s film and tell another side of the story, but was ultimately unsuccessful.
105 In 1920, African-American filmmaker Oscar Micheaux released Within Our Gatesa response to The Birth of a Nation. Within Our Gates depicts the hardships faced by African Americans during the era of Jim Crow laws. 106 Griffith s film was remixed in 2004 as Rebirth of a Nation by DJ Spooky. 107 Quentin Tarantino has said that he made his film Django Unchained 2012 to counter the falsehoods of The Birth of a Nation. In November 1915, William Joseph Simmons revived the Klan in Atlanta, Georgia, holding a cross burning at Stone Mountain.
Influence Edit. 28 430 109 The historian John Hope Franklin observed that, had it not been for The Birth of a Nationthe Klan might not have been reborn. Franklin wrote in 1979 that The influence of Birth of a Nation on the current view of Reconstruction has been greater than any other single forcebut that It is not at all difficult to find inaccuracies and distortions in the movie. Critical response Edit. Released in 1915, The Birth of a Nation has been credited as groundbreaking among its contemporaries for its innovative application of the medium of film.
According to the film historian Kevin Brownlow, the film was astounding in its time and initiated so many advances in film-making technique that it was rendered obsolete within a few years. 110 The content of the work, however, has received widespread criticism for its blatant racism. Film critic Roger Ebert wrote.
Certainly The Birth of a Nation 1915 presents a challenge for modern audiences. Unaccustomed to silent films and uninterested in film history, they find it quaint and not to their taste. Those evolved enough to understand what they are looking at find the early and wartime scenes brilliant, but cringe during the postwar and Reconstruction scenes, which are racist in the ham-handed way of an old minstrel show or a vile comic pamphlet. Despite its controversial story, the film has been praised by film critics, with Ebert mentioning its use as a historical tool The Birth of a Nation is not a bad film because it argues for evil.
Like Riefenstahl s Triumph of the Willit is a great film that argues for evil. To understand how it does so is to learn a great deal about film, and even something about evil. According to a 2002 article in the Los Angeles Timesthe film facilitated the refounding of the Ku Klux Klan in 1915. com similarly states that There is no doubt that Birth of a Nation played no small part in winning wide public acceptance for the KKK, and that throughout the film African Americans are portrayed as brutish, lazy, morally degenerate, and dangerous.
112 History. 113 David Duke used the film to recruit Klansmen in the 1970s. a seminal commercial spectacle but also a decisively original work of art in effect, the founding work of cinematic realism, albeit a work that was developed to pass lies off as reality. It s tempting to think of the film s influence as evidence of the inherent corruption of realism as a cinematic mode but it s even more revealing to acknowledge the disjunction between its beauty, on the one hand, and, on the other, its injustice and falsehood.
The movie s fabricated events shouldn t lead any viewer to deny the historical facts of slavery and Reconstruction. But they also shouldn t lead to a denial of the peculiar, disturbingly exalted beauty of Birth iq option b a Nationeven in its depiction of immoral actions and its realization of blatant propaganda. In 2013, the American critic Richard Brody wrote The Birth of a Nation was.
The worst thing about The Birth of a Nation is how good it is. The merits of its grand and enduring aesthetic make it impossible to ignore and, despite its disgusting content, also make it hard not to love. And it s that very conflict that renders the film all the more despicable, the experience of the film more of a torment together with the acknowledgment that Griffith, whose short films for Biograph were already among the treasures of world cinema, yoked his mighty talent to the cause of hatred which, still worse, he sincerely depicted as virtuous.
Brody also argued that Griffith unintentionally undercut his own thesis in the film, citing the scene before the Civil War when the Cameron family offers up lavish hospitality to the Stoneman family who travel past mile after mile of slaves working the cotton fields of South Carolina to reach the Cameron home. Brody maintained that a modern audience can see that the wealth of the Camerons comes from the slaves, forced to do back-breaking work picking the cotton.
Likewise, Brody argued that the scene where people in South Carolina iq option b the Confederate victory at the Battle of Bull Run by dancing around the eerie flare of a bonfire which imply a dance of deathforeshadowing the destruction of Sherman s March that was to come. Finally, Brody argued that the end of the film, where the Klan prevents defenseless African Americans from exercising their right to vote by pointing guns at them, today seems unjust and cruel.
In an article for The Atlanticfilm critic Ty Burr deemed The Birth of a Nation the most influential film in history while criticizing its portrayal of Black men as savage. In the same way, Brody wrote that the scene where the Klan dumps Gus s body off at the doorstep of Lynch is meant to have the audience cheering, but modern audiences find the scene obscene and horrifying. 115 Richard Corliss of Time wrote that Griffith established in the hundreds of one- and two-reelers he directed a cinematic textbook, a fully formed visual language, for the generations that followed.
More than anyone else more than all others combined he invented the film art. He brought it to fruition in The Birth of a Nation. Corliss praised the film s brilliant storytelling technique and noted that The Birth of a Nation is nearly as antiwar as it is antiblack. The Civil War scenes, which consume only 30 minutes of the extravaganza, emphasize not the national glory but the human cost of combat. Griffith may have been a racist politically, but his refusal to find uplift in the South s war against the Union and, implicitly, in any war at all reveals him as a cinematic humanist.
In 1992, the U. Library of Congress deemed the film culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant and selected it for preservation in the National Film Registry. 116 The American Film Institute recognized the film by ranking it 44 within the AFI s 100 Years. 100 Movies list in 1998. Historical portrayal Edit. The film remains controversial due to its interpretation of American history.
University of Houston historian Steven Mintz summarizes its message as follows Reconstruction was an unmitigated disaster, blacks could never be integrated into white society as equals, and the violent actions of the Ku Klux Klan were justified to reestablish honest government. 117 The South is portrayed as a victim. The first overt mentioning of the war is the scene in which Abraham Lincoln signs the call for the first 75,000 volunteers. However, the first aggression in the Civil War, made when the Confederate troops fired on Fort Sumter in 1861, is not mentioned in the film.
118 The film suggested that the Ku Klux Klan restored order to the postwar South, which was depicted as endangered by abolitionists, freedmen, and carpetbagging Republican politicians from the North. 119 The film is slightly less extreme than the books upon which it is based, in which Dixon misrepresented Reconstruction as a nightmarish time when Black men ran amok, storming into weddings to rape white women with impunity.
This is similar to the Dunning School of historiography which was current in academe at the time. The film portrayed President Abraham Lincoln as a friend of the South and refers to him as the Great Heart. 120 The two romances depicted in the film, Phil Stoneman with Margaret Cameron and Ben Cameron with Elsie Stoneman, reflect Griffith s retelling of history. The couples are used as a metaphor, representing the film s broader message of the need for the reconciliation of the North and South to defend white supremacy.
121 Among both couples, there is an attraction that forms before the war, stemming from the friendship between their families. With the war, however, both families are split apart, and their losses culminate in the end of the war with the defense of white supremacy. One of the intertitles clearly sums up the message of unity The former enemies of North and South are united again in defense of their Aryan birthright.
The film further reinforced the popular belief held by whites, especially in the South, of Reconstruction as a disaster. 28 432 In The Tragic EraBowers presented every Black politician in the South as corrupt, portrayed Republican Representative Thaddeus Stevens as a vicious race traitor intent upon making Blacks the equal of whites, and praised the Klan for saving civilization in the South. 28 432 Bowers wrote about Black empowerment that the worst sort of scum from the North like Stevens inflamed the Negro s egoism and soon the lustful assaults began.
Rape was the foul daughter of Reconstruction. In his 1929 book The Tragic Era The Revolution After Lincolnthe respected historian Claude Bowers treated The Birth of a Nation as a factually accurate account of Reconstruction. Academic assessment Edit. The American historian John Hope Franklin wrote that not only did Claude Bowers treat The Birth of a Nation as accurate history, but his version of history seemed to be drawn from The Birth of a Nation.
28 432 Historian E. Merton Coulter treated The Birth of a Nation as historically correct and painted a vivid picture of black beasts running amok, encouraged by alcohol-sodden, corrupt and vengeful Black Republican politicians. 28 432 Franklin wrote as recently as the 1970s that the popular journalist Alistair Cooke in his books and TV shows was still essentially following the version of history set out by The Birth of a Nationnoting that Cooke had much sympathy with the suffering of whites in Reconstruction while having almost nothing to say about the suffering of Blacks or about how Blacks were stripped of almost all their rights after 1877.
Veteran film reviewer Roger Ebert wrote. stung by criticisms that the second half of his masterpiece was racist in its glorification of the Ku Klux Klan and its brutal images of Blacks, Griffith tried to make amends in Intolerance 1916which criticized prejudice. Despite some similarities between the Congressman Stoneman character and Rep. Thaddeus Stevens of Pennsylvania, Rep. And in Broken Blossoms he told perhaps the first interracial love story in the movies even though, to be sure, it s an idealized love with no touching.
Stevens did not have the family members described and did not move to South Carolina during Reconstruction. However, Stevens biracial housekeeper, Lydia Hamilton Smith, was considered his common-law wife, and was generously provided for in his will. He died in Washington, D. In the film, Abraham Lincoln is portrayed in a positive light due to his belief in conciliatory postwar policies toward Southern whites. The president s views are opposite those of Austin Stoneman, a character presented in a negative light, who acts as an antagonist.
The assassination of Lincoln marks the transition from war to Reconstruction, each of which periods has one of the two acts of the film. 125 In including the assassination, the film also establishes to the audience that the plot of the movie has historical basis. 126 Franklin wrote the film s depiction of Reconstruction as a hellish time when Black freedmen ran amok, raping and killing whites with impunity until the Klan stepped in is not supported by the facts.
28 427 428 Franklin wrote that most freed slaves continued to work for their former masters in Reconstruction for the want of a better alternative and, though relations between freedmen and their former masters were not friendly, very few freedmen sought revenge against the people who had enslaved them. The civil rights movement and other social movements created a new generation of historians, such as scholar Eric Foner, who led a reassessment of Reconstruction.
The depictions of mass Klan paramilitary actions do not seem to have historical equivalents, although there were incidents in 1871 where Klan groups traveled from other areas in fairly large numbers to aid localities in disarming local companies of the all-Black portion of the state militia under various justifications, prior to the eventual Federal troop intervention, and the organized Klan continued activities as small groups of night riders.
Building on W. DuBois work but also adding new sources, they focused on achievements of the African American and white Republican coalitions, such as establishment of universal public education and charitable institutions in the South and extension of suffrage to Black men. In response, the Southern-dominated Democratic Party and its affiliated white militias had used extensive terrorism, intimidation and outright assassinations to suppress African-American leaders and voting in the 1870s and to regain power.
Film innovations Edit. In his review of The Birth of a Nation in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You DieJonathan Kline writes that with countless artistic innovations, Griffith essentially created contemporary film language. virtually every film is beholden to The Birth of a Nation in one way, shape or form. Griffith introduced the use of dramatic close-ups, tracking shots, and other expressive camera movements; parallel action sequences, crosscutting, and other editing techniques.
He added that the fact that The Birth of a Nation remains respected and studied to this day-despite its subject matter-reveals its lasting importance. Griffith pioneered such camera techniques as close-ups, fade-outs, and a carefully staged battle sequence with hundreds of extras made to look like thousands. Home media and restorations Edit. 9 The Birth of a Nation also contained many new artistic techniques, such as color tinting for dramatic purposes, building up the plot to an exciting climax, dramatizing history alongside fiction, and featuring its own musical score written for an orchestra.
For many years, The Birth of a Nation was poorly represented in home media and restorations. According to the silent film website Brenton Filmmany home media releases of the film consisted of poor quality DVDs with different edits, scores, running speeds and usually in definitely unoriginal black and white. This stemmed from several factors, one of which was the fact that Griffith and others had frequently reworked the film, leaving no definitive version.
One of the earliest high-quality home versions was film preservationist David Shepard s 1992 transfer of a 16mm print for VHS and LaserDisc release via Image Entertainment. Both were released on DVD by Image in 1998 and the United Kingdom s Eureka Entertainment in 2000. In the UK, Photoplay Productions restored the Museum of Modern Art s 35mm print that was the source of Shepard s 16 mm print, though they also augmented it with extra material from the British Film Institute.
It was also given a full orchestral recording of the original Breil score. A short documentary, The Making of The Birth of a Nationnewly produced and narrated by Shepard, was also included. Though broadcast on Channel 4 television and theatrically screened many times, Photoplay s 1993 version was never released on home video. Shepard s transfer and documentary were reissued in the US by Kino Video in 2002, this time in a 2-DVD set with added extras on the second disc.
These included several Civil War shorts also directed by D. 130 In 2011, Kino prepared a HD transfer of a 35 mm negative from the Paul Killiam Collection. They added some material from the Library of Congress and gave it a new compilation score. This version was released on Blu-ray by Kino in the US, Eureka in the UK as part of their Masters of Cinema collection and Divisa Home Video in Spain. In 2015, the year of the film s centenary, Photoplay Productions Patrick Stanbury, in conjunction with the British Film Institute, carried out the first full restoration.
It mostly used new 4K scans of the LoC s original camera negative, along with other early generation material. It, too, was given the original Breil score and featured the film s original tinting for the first time since its 1915 release. In popular culture Edit. The restoration was released on a 2-Blu-ray set by the BFI, alongside a host of extras, including many other newly restored Civil War-related films from the period.
The Birth of a Nation s reverent depiction of the Klan was lampooned in Mel Brooks Blazing Saddles 1974. 131 Ryan O Neal s character Leo Harrigan in Peter Bogdanovich s Nickelodeon 1976 attends the premiere of The Birth of a Nation and realizes that it will change the course of American cinema. 131 Clips from Griffith s film are shown in Robert Zemeckis Forrest Gump 1994where the footage is meant to portray the titular character s ancestor and namesake Nathan Bedford Forrest 132 The closing montage of Spike Lee s Bamboozled 2000along with other footage from demeaning portrayals of African Americans in early 20th century film 106 Lee s BlacKkKlansman 2018where Harry Belafonte s character Jerome Turner speaks about its role in the lynching of Jesse Washington as the modern Ku Kluk Klan led by Grand WizardDavid Duke Topher Grace screens it as propaganda.
133 Director Kevin Willmott s mockumentary C. It shows part of an imagined Griffith film, The Capture of Dishonest Abewhich resembles The Birth of a Nation and was supposedly adapted from Thomas Dixon s The Yankee. The Confederate States of America 2004 portrays an imagined history where the Confederacy won the Civil War. 108 In Justin Simien s Dear White People 2014Sam Tessa Thompson screens a short film called The Rebirth of a Nation which portrays white people wearing whiteface while criticizing Barack Obama.
106 In 2016, Nate Parker produced and directed the film The Birth of a Nationbased on Nat Turner s slave rebellion; Parker clarified. I ve reclaimed this title and re-purposed it as a tool to challenge racism and white supremacy in America, to inspire a riotous disposition toward any and all injustice in this country and abroad and to promote the kind of honest confrontation that will galvanize our society toward healing and sustained systemic change.
Fechar Pedido Entrar. Seja bem vindo a à nossa loja online. 3 em 1 DUO RENDE MUITO CORALAR SUPER LAVAVEL ANTIMANCHAS DECORA SOL E CHUVA CHEGA DE MOFO PAREDEX PINTA. MASSA CORAL MASSA BRAZILIAN. CORALIT HAMMERITE SPARLACK FERROLACK SINTELUX BRAZILIAN. DIRETO NO GESSO GESSO E DRYWALL. TRINCHA ROLO DE LÃ DE CARNEIRO ROLO DE LÃ SINTETICA ROLO DE LÃ DE POLIESTER ROLO DE TEXTURA ESCOVA DE AÇO CAÇAMBA PARA PINTURA CABO PARA PINTURA ROLO DE ESPUMA.
REMOVE E LIMPA PREENCHE E REPARA NIVELA E ALISA. BATIDA DE PEDRA ANTI RUIDO. SELADORA BRAZILIAN GALVILUX SELADOR ACRILICO. MAXIVED MSA PINCEL VEDA-CHOQUE. SELADORA PARA PLÁSTICO SOLUÇÃO DESENGRAXANTE THINNER E DILUENTES. MASSA RÁPIDA RETOQUE RÁPIDO POLIESTER FILLER POLIESTER MAXI LIGHT POLIESTER FIBRA DE VIDRO POLIESTER PARA PLÁSTICO ADESIVO PLÁSTICO BRANCO. ULTRA PRIMER PRIMER UNIVERSAL PRIMER PU. MASSA DE POLIR BASE SOLVENTE MASSA DE POLIR BASE ÁGUA.
Confira os destaques da semana. VERNIZ PU FOSCO VINILICO WASH PRIMER VERNIZ ALTO SÓLIDO. LIXA LIQUIDA ALABASTINE - 500ML. REPARA PAREDES ACAO RAPIDA ALABASTINE - 330GR. DIRETO GESSO BRANCO NEVE CORAL - GALAO 3,6L. REPARA PAREDES ALABASTINE - 1KG.
Coments:03.04.2020 : 03:35 Fegar:
MultiBoot Utility 1.
06.04.2020 : 10:47 Kalkis:
MORE CAR VEHICLE ELECTRONICS CATEGORIES.